I do listen to Rush, as well as Michael Savage and Sean Hannity. And yes, they’re still wrong. In fact, they’re all quite comical in that they think they sound intelligent by changing facts to fit their own little ideologies. Does that mean I win the challenge?
Rush is the biggest hack of them all, in fact. He’s got little to do but spew the talking points of a dying party, and he’s given far to much credit by those who practice blind faith (read: Republicans). If that’s the Right’s idea of intelligent talk, I’d hate to hear their dribble.
Oh wait. I hear that every time I listen to Rush, too.
Savage is just that. He was actually a Democrat less than 20 years ago, so I’m not sure what he actually is in real life. Suggesting blind faith is a bit of a blunt instrument, considering all the people that listen to him and agree with him.
I find it strange you say he’s got “little to do but…” when he’s getting paid hundreds of millions of dollars to do it for a living. Its his job, buddy. That’s like saying I’ve got little to do but study cellular polarity proteins.
Chris said,
March 31, 2009 at 1:34 pm
I do listen to Rush, as well as Michael Savage and Sean Hannity. And yes, they’re still wrong. In fact, they’re all quite comical in that they think they sound intelligent by changing facts to fit their own little ideologies. Does that mean I win the challenge?
Rush is the biggest hack of them all, in fact. He’s got little to do but spew the talking points of a dying party, and he’s given far to much credit by those who practice blind faith (read: Republicans). If that’s the Right’s idea of intelligent talk, I’d hate to hear their dribble.
Oh wait. I hear that every time I listen to Rush, too.
regulusred said,
March 31, 2009 at 1:45 pm
Savage is just that. He was actually a Democrat less than 20 years ago, so I’m not sure what he actually is in real life. Suggesting blind faith is a bit of a blunt instrument, considering all the people that listen to him and agree with him.
I find it strange you say he’s got “little to do but…” when he’s getting paid hundreds of millions of dollars to do it for a living. Its his job, buddy. That’s like saying I’ve got little to do but study cellular polarity proteins.
Yes, you do win, Chris.
Chris said,
March 31, 2009 at 2:33 pm
Studying cellular polarity proteins is oodles more useful than being an ideological mouthpiece, however, no matter what his salary may be.
regulusred said,
March 31, 2009 at 10:55 pm
Depending, of course, on how much value you attribute to the conservatives in this country. Personally, I’d say Rush is far more important than me.